Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 07:24
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why did lobsters evolve bright colors if they are neither poisonous nor venomous?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What type of crossdresser are you?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists stunned to observe that humpback whales might be trying to talk to us - ZME Science
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
The Best Time to Take Vitamin D for Maximum Absorption, According to Health Experts - Yahoo
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
More seniors are using cannabis than ever before despite health risks, research shows - Fox News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Human-sized Labubu doll sells for more than $150,000 - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Single-dose CAR-T therapy potentially curative in multiple myeloma - Medical Xpress